Chapter 1 Understanding Who Needs Academic Language
This chapter
starts with 3 abbreviations; ELLS which stands for English Language learners,
ESL which stands for English as a Second Language, and LEP which stands for
Limited English Proficient. Then, it
talks about Cummins’s BICS which stands for Basic Interpersonal Communicative
Skills, communicative competence in English, and Cummins’s CALP which stands
for Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency, academic English competence.
I like how the
book distinguishes between academic English. This terms lead to talk about
problems in the American schools and growing poverty. Then, it discusses the
concerns about many students who struggle academically & fail high-stakes
standardized tests. These demographic trends help to identify types of learners
who need academic language instruction.
This chapter
focuses on the types of students who need help with academic language and
encourages teachers to honor what they bring to the classroom and learn more
about their interests. The Freemans describe three types of learners: a) newly
arrived with adequate formal schooling, b) newly arrived with limited or
interrupted formal schooling, and c) long-term English Learners. The schools need to identify these types. It
is a surprise that ELLs are “economically, ethnically, and linguistically
isolated from mainstream students” (p. 3) and some English speakers are
struggling learners too, particularly whose dialects are not nonstandard and
whose home languages differ in structure and form from standard academic
English.
I like how the
Freemans represent these learners by examples, two examples for Long-term English
learner (LTELs) and another two for limited formal schooling (LFS). They analyze
and show what they have and what they need. Then, they use the Ogbu’s
classification of minority students into ‘’immigrant minorities,” who are not
influenced by the mainstream society and measure their success by the standard
of their homeland, & “involuntary minorities,” who are influenced by
majority-group attitude and values and measure success by mainstream
standards. There is a detailed description
of both minorities (pp.10-12). For Standard English learners (SELs), there are
two examples and the same for adequate formal schooling.
From their
analysis, LFS
who are in schools for an extended time may also be referred to as LTELs who are students who have been in the
U.S. for a long time, but who have not become proficient in English. They often
face different sets of obstacles and issues than more recent newcomers. To meet the needs of LTELs, teachers may require a
somewhat different approach. LTEL's face
challenges because as they began to acquire English, they have lost proficiency
in their native language. Although LTELs
typically have developed conversational skills, because of the "social
distance" between immigrant communities and mainstream communities, many
have had minimal exposure to the English in their communities and little reason
to learn or use it.
All in all,
these analyses, descriptions, and examples are to show the differences, needs,
backgrounds, …etc between these types of learners. I like how they compare these types and show
their advantages & disadvantages. Moreover, they use figures and tables to demonstrate
their arguments. The learners are certainly not all alike, and they have
different experiences. Many SELs and ELLs with limited formal schooling and
LTELs struggle to develop academic language proficiency. There are differences
and need different kinds of support although they face a challenge.
The Freemans end
the chapter by including some reading tasks to prepare the students such as:
-
Retrieving information.
-
Developing an
interpretation.
-
Reflecting on
the content and structure of texts.